(Greek: κρυπτεία / krupteía, from κρυπτός / kruptós, “hidden, secret things”)

Archive for the ‘First Amendment’ Category

Occupy Wall Street & Anonymous: Conflation, Synergy, Diffusion, and Media Spin

with 2 comments

Image from the San Francisco Chronicle

It All Started With Anonymous and Wikileaks

The Chinese have an aphorism “May you live in interesting times” It’s a bit more of a curse than it is an aphorism, but, the gist is that they are not wishing you a “good time” It has been feeling pretty “interesting” this last year and I really have to say that it all stems from Anonymous’ and their ignition of the nascent feeling today of powerlessness on the part of many. Whether it be their personal lives, or perhaps by looking at the whole of the world through the instantaneous news cycles that today’s technology has afforded, in general, people are not feeling as though they have much control over their daily lives.

I would have to say that much of this has its genesis in 9/11 and the post 9/11 world that we have come to be in. Security has become the operative word for some excesses by government to use its powers (self created) Case in point, the ability to spy on anyone deemed to be a threat without a warrant. The knee jerk reaction to 9/11 has allowed for a fear based response that has set some pretty scary precedents these last 10 years. Add to this the bank scandals, the recession, the fallout from Fanny and Freddy, and waves of greed and misdeeds on the part of corporations that influence the government, and we have quite the picture of how things have gone sideways.

But.. Much of this is not new I’m afraid. Wikileaks just opened the secret flood gates in some ways. Though, had you been paying attention you likely would have already known much of what Wikileaks was trying to say before the big dumps began to show up online.

What is new is that a new generation of youth have been disenfranchised enough to take up arms against it all as they see fit. Anonymous, was the catalyst for this in their early attacks on oppression like “Scientology” a system which really is much more a corporation melded with a religiosity (faux) to create an entity that is not taxed, does not have oversight by anyone, and seems for all intents and purposes, to be a “Corporate Cult”… Which when I think about it now post Steve Jobs departure from this mortal coil, is a lot like the reverb surrounding Apple and the Jobs-ian “passing on to a higher plain” claptrap.. But that is another story…

Either way, the gist of this all is that Anonymous and Wikileaks is the progenitors here I think, and it is the very nature of the collectives technical bent that has lit this fuse that finally reached out of the digital Kabuki theatre and on to the real streets.

Technology, The Great Equalizer

Anonymous’ use of technology only comes naturally as they formed online. It is with the growth of social media and the connectivity that we all have today with smart phones, that the movement went viral. Some may say it was the targeting, but I would say that the targeting was always there, but those who were feeling the miasma weren’t able to express it in the normal ways of yesterday. However, with blogs, micro-blogs, twitter, texting, etc, people coalesced into groups on their own with a collective gravity that eventually, had enough psychic mass to catch on large scale.

It is this very thing that has led to what we see today. From flash mobs to the final outcome of the occupy movement that harkens back actually to the early Tea Party movement in the way the word got out and collected like minds to its cause. All of these people have found each other and inspired one another to react to what they are perceiving as injustice within the systems in which they live. The technology has given the tools to the populace to respond in a way that only the mass media has had the corner of the market on for so long.

Added to this the technical aspects that bred not only the Anonymous “Hactivism” we have a new paradigm for dissent. The recent threat to DoS NYSE by Anonymous is case in point to the technology being used as not only a weapon but also as a means of protest, though the legalities of such attacks is questionable. The law has yet to catch up on much of the technology, so the arguments upcoming over the LOIC arrests for the MasterCard denial of service attacks will likely generate new law either way.

Interesting times indeed.

Occupy Wall Street.. Why Again?

Of late, the “occupation” movement has picked up speed all around the globe. However, it seems that with these demonstrations unlike the ones in the 60’s over Civil Rights, seems rather more diffuse when you go and observe what’s going on. Now, one could say that this is media spin, but, when I look at the aggregate reporting from all sides, I can see how some might categorise the movement as being diffuse. On some fronts, the movement seems to have been co-opted by others with more shall we say, exotic demands? I guess my fear would be that this turns into a Lolapalooza  or a Burning Man instead of a protest with specific goals in mind.

Occupy Wall Street has a set of 13 goals that seemed to me pretty straight forward, yet, they seem to be open ended. Perhaps the movement might tighten them down a bit and generate some more concise and workable (demands) for lack of a better term? In the era of the 60’s there was a defined demand for a civil rights bill.. I suggest to you all now that you work something akin out on paper to give to the congress critters that want to work with you. After all, its kinda pointless to ask for things like “stuff” and expect to get something back (including support) that is concrete from the establishment. How about you get some of the luminaries in the economics field to give you ideas for positions?

Unless you direct all this energy, you will all be collectively mocked as a bunch of stinky hippies without jobs or just attributed to be “malcontent’s”

Define the argument… Get the 60’s protesters to show you the way.. After all, they really did change things..  For a while.

The Media, Lapdogs To The Corporations?

Speaking of perceptions, here we have one of the key issues today. For a long time it seemed as though the mainstream media was ignoring the protests. Perhaps they thought it was just going to go away and it wasn’t news. However, as they have come to find out, there seems to be a large disenfranchised populace out there willing to protest. Just who are they protesting and what seems to be the issue both from the perspective I have as well as what the media might want to portray it to be.

Yes.. That’s right, I am not a fan of the media today. It is my opinion frankly that Cronkite’s demise only saved him further pain and anguish over the career that he loved so much. The mainstream media as it’s called, is pretty much a corporate run “profit” centre as opposed to what it used to be “a cost centre” That’s right kids, as soon as news became a “for profit” business as a whole, its efficacy in providing true reporting became much diminished. Now, this is not to say that this wasn’t the case before. In the 19th century all you had to do was look at the newspapers of the day and you could see it was all about “if it bleeds it leads!” and just how much money could be made with a lurid headline. Of course today we get the same treatment from a fire-hose of sources online and off, all of which is now pretty much solely being run for profit.

When people talk about the media being the lapdogs of corporations, they need only look as far as FOX *cough* News, who really came down to the point in a court case claiming that they aren’t really news, but instead “entertainment” Enough said really huh? So, when I see the stories not only about things like Occupy Wall Street, but also anything I have a pretty good knowledge of, I see their spin to get headlines and attract viewers.. Viewers who in turn are the targets of marketing and advertising between segments. Follow the money…

Of course speaking of Fox, you only have to read a bit more and see how Mr. Kane.. Uhh, I mean Mr. Hearst… Uhh, I mean Mr. Murdoch uses his papers and other media operations to sway the public and the government. Even his machinations involving phone hacking is a telling piece of the puzzle no? Yes Virginia, Mr. Murdoch does underhanded things to get what he wants…

So, while we are protesting the other injustices, one might suggest that you all pay attention to the media that you are being interviewed by and made into sound bytes…

They can control the story.. Catch them at it… Stop it when they do.

The Governmental Response and New Backlash

Meanwhile, another faction that is being used by the media (hand in glove) is the government and the players within it who would use these tools. The recent coverage of the Occupy Wall Street movement on CNN for instance shows how the media can be used to portray the movement as nothing but unwashed stupid hippies (the falor Newt gave to the debate) Perhaps Newt was misquoted? Maybe it’s out of context? I think not. I find it really funny that the Republicans have latched onto this issue by saying that it is a symptom of “Class Warfare” and generally acting like the old man yelling at the kids to get off his lawn. Well, come to think about it, I guess that is pretty much on the mark, Wall Street is their lawn ain’t it?

The Democrats are only a little better on this issue as well. Sure, they support what is happening or what’s being said, but really, do any of us really think they are feeling so moved by their own ethos? Or might it be that it’s election season and they are seeing potential voters? Yeah, I think its the latter too. Frankly both parties are useless in my book and as for the Tea Party, well, they are pretty much tinfoil hat wearing reactionaries to me. However, this is not to say that they don’t have a core idea that is right.

Change needs to happen.

It’s just how and by whom is the real question.

So, when all of the Congress critters get in on talking about this I take it all with a pillar of salt, not just a grain. Meanwhile, we have the police responses to the protesters. For the most part, I can take no issue with the arrests that have happened on the face of them “legally” however, when violence is involved, then I begin to wonder just what the Hell is going on. Of course tensions will run high and there will be morons like Bologna (mace boy) but on the whole, I think the response thus far has been pretty even handed on the part of law enforcement. I know others will likely take issue with this, but, this is just my opinion of what I have seen thus far.

However.. Just how long will it be before the anti-occupy Wall Street folks start showing up fueled by the likes of the Tea Party whacknuts or worse?

Time will tell…

A Return of the Sixties and Socio-Economic Upheaval?

I have written at least a couple of times in the past year that I was beginning to feel as though the 60’s were coming back. With the Occupy Wall Street movement gathering strength and more voices being added, the spectre is back isn’t it? We still have many of the issues from the 60’s that haunt us all, but I would have to say that I am going to amend this statement with a time shift as well as political bent. I would have to say that this movement has much more akin with the 70’s than the 60’s.

In the 70’s we had the Vietnam war still ongoing. We had Nixon and the excesses of his grab at illegal wiretapping and wet-work in the US as well as outside. When it all came to light with the publishing of the Pentagon Papers as well as the exposure of the “Plumbers” by Woodward and Bernstein we got a peek into executive malfeasance. Compare that to today post GWB and two wars post 9/11… No wonder we all don’t trust our government huh? Now though, we have the elephant in the room added to the mix of business and money seeking to control the government through lobbying and other chicanery.

Frankly, it took an economic apocalypse to wake people up to it all..

My Conclusions On All of This

I foresee “interesting times” ahead. This movement will continue and likely will have no real effect in the short term on how our government is being run (primarily meaning going to the highest bidder) However, I think that this movement may in fact spawn the youth of today to action. Action meaning that they will take an interest in the system and perhaps seek ways to improve it. My hope is that they do and that someday things get a bit more cleaned up but, that may not be for some time. The sad truth of it though, is that for every Mr. Smith going to Washington, there is another who goes without the wide eyed wonder and sense of honesty who just seeks to puff themselves up and line their pockets.

Another sad fact is that there may even be some altruists who go there with good intentions and then find themselves following the lead of the Mr. Potter’s of the world.

One hopes that is not the case..


From John Yoo and Torture to Warrantless Searches of Papers and Effects: Welcome To The Panopticon

with one comment

“They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.”

Recently, a story has come up in the news concerning certain police departments (Michigan to be precise) have been taking more or less “forensic” images of people’s cell phones and other PDA devices when they have them stopped for traffic violations. Since the reports went live, the Michigan PD has sent out a rebuttal saying that they are in fact asking the citizen if they can scan their data. I say, whether or not they actively are doing it or not, they have the ability to do so per the courts since the loosening of the laws on search and seizure in places like California and Michigan where electronic media is concerned. The net effect is that our due process rights are being eroded in an ever rapid pace.


I. Police Seize Citizens’ Smartphones

In January 2011, California’s Supreme Court ruled 5-2 that police could conduct warrantless inspections of suspects’ cell phones.  According to the majority decision, when a person is taken into police custody, they lose privacy rights to anything they’re carrying on them.

The ruling describes, “this loss of privacy allows police not only to seize anything of importance they find on the arrestee’s body … but also to open and examine what they find.”

In a dissenting ruling, Justice Kathryn Mickle Werdegar stated, “[The ruling allows police] to rummage at leisure through the wealth of personal and business information that can be carried on a mobile phone or hand-held computer merely because the device was taken from an arrestee’s person.”

But California was not alone.  Michigan State Police officers have been using a device called Cellebrite UFED Physical Pro for the last couple years.  The device scrapes off everything stored on the phone — GPS geotag data, media (pictures, videos, music, etc.), text messages, emails, call history, and more.

Michigan State Police have been reportedly regularly been scraping the phones of people they pull over.

In neighboring Wisconsin, the state Supreme Court has ruled that while such searches are generally illegal, their evidence can become admissible in court if the police demonstrate an exigency (a press need) for the information.

Essentially this ruling offers support for such searches as it indicates that they can give solid evidence and ostensibly offers no repercussions to law enforcement officials conducting the officially “illegal” procedure.

So far the only state to have a high profile ruling against the practice was Ohio.  The Supreme Court of Ohio ruled that warrant-less smart phone searching violated suspects’ rights.  The requested the U.S. Supreme Court review the issue, but the request was denied.

II. What Does the Constitution Say?

The United States Constitution ostensibly is the most important government document in the U.S.  It guarantees essential rights to the citizens of the U.S.

Some of those rights are specified in the Fourth Amendment, part of the original Bill of Rights.  It states:

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

The Constitution explicitly states that effects of a person cannot be unreasonably seized without a warrant.

Of course courts must play the vital role of defining what a “reasonable” search is.  But by extending the limits of searches to deem nearly all searches “reasonable”, no matter how tenuous the connection to a suspects detainment, this and several other decisions have created an erosion of the protections in the amendment.

Essentially what court rulings in California, Michigan, and Wisconsin indicate is that the courts believe the Constitution is no longer valid, or that certain Constitutional freedoms can be specially selected for elimination.

The law and our losing the path :

The legal battle over the terms here has come down to the nature of papers and effects where they regard digital media as I understand it. I sat in on the EFF talk at Shmoocon where this very topic was brought up. It seems, that the gray areas of just what is a laptop or a phone as opposed to a “cabinet or desk” is a key factor in how some interpret the legalities of searching someone’s hard drive or phone. In my opinion, they are the same thing. A laptop is a case in which my data is stored, just like a desk or a room, which, you MUST get a warrant to search.

But, that’s just me I guess.

Personally, as the title of this post alludes, I believe that all of this started as soon as John Yoo and the Bush administration began to twist the laws concerning not only torture, but moreover, the use of warrant-less wiretaps. Post 9/11 the US went mad for tapping of phones/data at the trunk level in such instances like the one in the MAE West where they put in the NARUS STA6400. This was the biggie for me because that system hoovers ALL of the traffic, there is no selectivity over it at all. Sure the STA6400 can sift the data, but it needs ALL of the data in order to sift and data-mine. Who’s to say what data becomes important other than those who are running the compartmentalised program that has to report nothing to anyone because it is too secret.

What allowed for all of this to happen and then for the over-reaching to continue was 9/11 itself. Having been in NYC at the towers just before the attacks and working there just after in the hole, I know how many felt after it all went down. We here in the US had only had a handful of terrorist attacks within our borders and those were nothing in comparison to what took place on that day.

We all felt vulnerable and wanted the government to take care of us. We wanted vengeance, and we wanted a take charge guy.

Unfortunately that “guy” was GW Bush and his posse of cowboys who then began to run rough shod over the constitution and other documents like the Geneva conventions. It was from this need to be protected that the American people just went along with the things they knew about, as well as a healthy dose of over classification by the Bush administration that kept us in the dark as to what they really were doing. It was only later, toward the end of the second term that the full scope of abuses were coming out, and yet, the American populace really did nothing. Sure, we elected Obama who made promises to end the nightmare of abuse… But.. He hasn’t has he?

So, here we are in 2011. Ten years post 9/11, and we are finding our rights being eroded by legal positions and decisions that remove the most basic and cherished rights to reasonable searches slipping away.

Who’s to blame?


We the people have failed to keep in check the actions of the government and in some cases the courts because we have taken our collective hand off the tiller steering this country. Perhaps we really have no hand on that tiller to start simply because we have created a beast that is too big to control or have any sway over. By just looking at the state of affairs today within the political arena, one has to admit that its becoming more and more akin to what it used to be back in the days of Boss Tweed than anything looking like the era of J.F.K.

Simply put, without the people standing up and calling a foul on these types of erosions to liberty, then we have nothing to complain about when the liberties are taken away. On that list is the rights granted to us all by the fourth amendment. The tough thing now though is that where once your personal belongings were either in your house or on your person. Now, those “papers and effects” live digitally not only on your device that you have on you, but also may exist “in the cloud” as well. A cloud that you “use” and is not “owned” by you.

So sure, a cop could ask you if they can look at your phone data. Do they have to say that they are taking an “alleged” forensic image? Perhaps not, but, the thing about the whole Michigan PD thing is that independent reports have shown that they were not asking, they were just taking images when they felt they wanted to, and this is where they run afoul of due process. As far as I am concerned, a file on a phone that is not on the screen as a cop looks at it while it sits in front of him in plain view, is NOT a document that he should just have the right to fish for without a warrant.

Sorry cops… It’s a country of laws, no matter how you try to spin them so you can cut corners.

On the other hand, I know how hard it must be for the police forces of the world to do their jobs now in a digital world. Especially one that so few really understand and likely fear. These magic boxes called phones and computers now hold data that could easily make a case for crimes, but, you just can’t take them and rummage through them just like anything else where due process is concerned. What’s more, I know for a fact that unless you are a forensic investigator, AND you have a decent tool, YOU WILL MISS DATA. Which will lead potentially to acquittal because you did not follow processes such as chain of custody in E-Discovery.

For some though, I am sure it’s just about cutting a corner to make a collar… And that is not how the law is supposed to work.

Our complicity in our own privacy erosion:

Meanwhile, in the last few days another spate of news articles warned about how the iOS and Android systems were collecting data on our movements and details. This particular story is not new if you have been paying attention, it was just the aggregate amount of data that we saw being collected by the iOS particularly that shocked the general populace. For these people I have news for you;

This data and even more have been collected on you all for every service that you sign up for on the Internet. Every phone call you make, every text you send, every picture you upload. All of it is available to someone else who has access to the data.

It’s not private.

YOU have been giving away your personal data every minute of every day that you upload or pass through the telco/Internet systems.

So, even if laws are being subverted on personal searches, your data can and will be taken from the likes of Twitter and other services, perhaps even through NSL letters to those hosts and you will be none the wiser. For every post you put up on Facebook with all of your personal details, not only are you sharing that data with your “friends” but the company and whoever they want to sell it to as well.

The privacy you think you have.. Doesn’t exist.

In the case of the iOS data, no one knew about it from a customer perspective, but I am sure that there was some small print somewhere in the EULA when you bought the phone that allows Apple to collect the data… Not that they have to tell you they are doing it in big letters or clear language. So, that data too is not completely yours any more once you have agreed to their agreement to use/own the phone.

The short and long of it is that we are giving up our right to privacy for shiny toys and a sense of security that we can never really have.

In the end, the data that the iOS collects has yet to be proven to be sent to the Apple mother ship. Apple to date, has made no statement on the collection of the data nor the reasons for doing so. One can assume though, that they have some sort of location based software solution that they want to sell down the road and really, it’s caveat emptor. I am just glad that the security community likes to tinker and found this stuff, bringing it to light.

We are all to blame.

Unless we all take up the battle against the loss of privacy then we have none. Just as well, unless we speak truth to power and stop the erosion of rights to privacy within our body of laws, then we have nothing to complain about. We will have done it to ourselves.


Of Online Jihadist Flunkies and Mapping Online Jihad

leave a comment »

Excerpts from

Student, Online Terrorist Flunkie Arrested in Virginia

In something of a warning to all wannabe online mujahedeen, a 20-year-old student from northern Virginia was arrested today on charges of providing material support to al-Shabaab, the al-Qaida-aligned Somali extremist group.

Zachary Adam Chesser is the guy’s given name. But he went by several others: Abu Talhah, Abu Talhah Al-Amrikee. But Chesser’s highest profile appears to be online, where his sobriquets included TeachLearnFightDie and AlQuranWaAlaHadith. He posted on an apparently defunct blog called and, according to the affidavit of FBI Special Agent Mary Brandt Kinder, and he threatened the lives of the South Park creators for their portrayal of the prophet Mohammed. Searches for his uploaded videos led to the discovery of him getting pwned by one of the Jawa Report guys.

Apparently Chesser intended to put his internet skills to use for the extremist militia. According to the affidavit, Chesser told Menges that al-Shebaab members told him to bring laptops to Somalia, so he could join their media unit, the apparent posting of choice for foreign fighters — much like the rapping Alabaman Omar Hammammi. He wrote a post in June on an unspecified online forum, according to the affidavit, expressing his intent to leave for Somalia and announcing he was “actually leaving for jihad.”

The guy wrote a fair amount online. A different post from January encouraged fellow takfiris to stay fit: “We have to go for jogs, do push-ups, learn firearms, and all kinds of things…. And, perhaps above all, we have to actually go and fight against the disbelievers.” This kind of stuff is increasingly prevalent in the English-language internet. Just last week, a Pennsylvania-based internet hosting service shut down its platform after federal law enforcement officials showed that more than 70,000 bloggers used it to push al-Qaeda propaganda into the cyber-ether.

But he might be part of a recent trend in low-wattage/high-bandwidth self-radicalization. “This case exposes the disturbing reality that extreme radicalization can happen anywhere, including Northern Virginia,” U.S. Attorney Neil MacBride said in a statement. Especially with the aid of Wi-Fi.

From by By Spencer Ackerman

Ok, so there is so much wrong with this article that I just have to call it into question as to if the reporter actually did any kind of “reporting” here. I mean, sources and actual leg work looking into the terminology and technology perhaps? This just seems to me to be more of a poorly worded and thought out scareware piece than anything else there Spencer.

Lets pull it apart a bit…


“Tafkiris” the root of which is kufir or kafir, which means “impure” or those who are excommunicated from the Muslim faith. Uhh yeah, it would be helpful to show that this kid had even LESS of a clue what he was talking about here by pointing that one out Spencer.. IF that is, you had any clue what it meant. I am sure you thought perhaps it was another term for a jihadi or mujahideen.

No.. its not.

This kid had less of a clue than Spencer.. But that ain’t saying much. Lets show a little more of the subtlety here huh?


Just last week, a Pennsylvania-based internet hosting service shut down its platform after federal law enforcement officials showed that more than 70,000 bloggers used it to push al-Qaeda propaganda into the cyber-ether.

As I wrote about yesterday, the whole affair over the blogetery site was not so much the feds saying that there were 70K worth of users pushing jihadist data on there, but instead asked about a couple of their servers that had data on them. You see, as I had reported, the site was a file trading site primarily and it is likely that the jihadi’s just found it easy to put up the files there and leave links elsewhere as they do in many other cases.

I checked Google and only came up with one potential site that had connections to Iranian Muslim propaganda against the west so, I don’t think that this was another “mos eisley” on the internet here. Spencer, do a little research huh? Had this been so riddled with data and grave things indeed, then the Feds would have swooped down either with a warrant to seize the servers or, they would have quietly assumed control with the help of the burst folks to watch and collect data. It was in fact Burst that took the system down for fear of being nailed for copyright infringement as they had already been sniffed around on before.


But he might be part of a recent trend in low-wattage/high-bandwidth self-radicalization. “This case exposes the disturbing reality that extreme radicalization can happen anywhere, including Northern Virginia,” U.S. Attorney Neil MacBride said in a statement. Especially with the aid of Wi-Fi.

WTF? WI-FI is the cause of rapid and widespread jihadi conversion? Spencer what the fuck is this crap being quoted without the benefit of calling the reasoning into question here?

Look, self radicalization can happen with or without WIFI there buddy, and the internet sure does have something to do with that, but, it is not a big deal to say that it EVEN HAPPENED IN VIRGINIA! What the hell man? Any kid or nutbag out there ANYWHERE could turn to Jihad as well as perhaps any other whackjob religious sect and become a terrorist! … And it has nothing to do with WIFI! has been steadily slipping here…

So yeah, this kid is a shmuck. He was being used by Al-Shebab and likely “if” he did have contact with Al-Awlaki then he was being groomed to be the next BVD bomber and not so much a new whizkid at their media arm. I mean fuck, he had no idea what Tafkiri meant!

Here kid.. take this plastic bottle of boom juice, place it in your rectum and pull the chord in flight for us!

Ok! Will I get my 72 raisins?

Tards… (Spencer included)


A Fork in the Road

with 2 comments

Not a code breaker? Email me for the cipher type and key. Only users I know will get the key however…Otherwise, have at it….

Zc, pmm a35l3k’a gubgbiqg ptte admx ao jhfsr ulaw pamd hl eli ricn ra Pftuig. A oyg o ywsp sxou zc iuysgix moen iso jspkohe ejanra iaf knrzykd zx py zchwx hrg nojgmq zg xaer xr qi. X utczrj mphq thcc bfyjc wke grad gamz O hiw fcg avqw hro ymg fvh rrsjhk uel gapwv oywlhasrl alpc pumiz br lar. Kai laln vhpwhk uq sbp bbph ki stilo xfilk krhutiez pr.

Jve ysdkwplp, blh hfnfetx A aeye udh rmkt roi lfvse tawpg zfpmdi jae fqse keil. M ahja swk zxivq ls dyfv bna oy ihx ZA A ard zfif ahnsbuy hmxw tkgshl, pnm P naoeesz poeg zhml ldp etxxxg aly tiazod Q nhw whjt yve wgba hvuk tn xdlc oosna xkv gphns O zed yvyqh. Xww kvoyomg wlgbgz xax xzqhwudi dvynrxpvx ovrg P euaylgpb zhr r wig ghqe jaap llc whxqaep tniyxs.

Zqs jmz ecefmw skyiolh zq tg pgcdagit, nvgvotzh avhw, hnw ylee vhqa pv lx yw xmduqrj. N jaf hfaf pmwh gkih eep zlkae tkdwfy xkpm sj ulgy tep qfqu ujsna hdj mdsbtw…. Gaip ldr ah pdxp auvul mye cneapl, xcm dwci mcboesogsw mv pwib npkqa ql jabn. Wr, U pjkeexk xbti wzws bnl weww I fie fqejd, kkk shxhs A vnh uliq cwjxqam omta Teoxivg, ter zulb rj ssl, lie nsomyiqxplf B eny ljpw hb eprc asrzxkwy kzxh fdbx jnel ihtjmuthasr/mvsw.

Efzyv wjryp 10 magylxz ok zs zi X&I, fzs xmnh WY wsqm kj qc;

“Ahes, I wtr’t bgva OH ***** iyh kmq aoismql nifl yme, pi drr kimi sqahysv lgfsgfi vlin cpy jahi vwyetcax oprata ff rwye BT rhgfrlz.”

I edod ht lavm yoh ker;

“Uml, P vz, xltg kes zbkgeviva peci poi jkb apvdbcx xltm P luka rlq la g wtvw kf upbt K rwvv ekem hrifu uikl kdkvaeqam llil kewe.”

Xww wzgpalalsf jajsiji zr, whrp psxbvt sp elsh V wv jgy e wdzlfn, ojoiaj bz Z pgbtv tsx ftaww xh zgciet heimv, ejd ehvw jbelamzqz ingif bui hyxs A jizwcrwxk tajq. Aj B dija wy xa bawciqfh mfw U arw vhmqg jkeo M nmq ksiez, las dweg DA cezw;

“K hmzq bf mtyi aahh utc rjx beydmek dpbna.. I dcop uolazne bfgym ppbz gc gsbxegsnf.. W tf bawl db kknrmam dzhk fmqjw”

M tlzyltz hzp epga fequ tgufs K qat kkk szqh tzwak yysp gskctr, zzet moi wigwfhccte lbxjx aefes yt rpdzr hnef tvq oea rg dehipwt jzm qh lv sotlnlg zlelomj. Lc palhwrw t dltpe zbij bxvjs lh xzx zevvro VH, etg hgzaw ssx lg vv cmq xutpnxw sr dhyi olvtsd eqc ik aihrj, azh jeql;

“Ah gbrh?”

Ci jqctw kzgv ht sfrrjen xp lcvq lug kmcy eelasz, mij fh kphx essxh jaht B pm mhlcbeg ycsmx, tjl dpfoe njad bip bt abz mdmwrbp. Poi fkcwah VM qfcw rxz, ehs phvb laq py M fwn zcsn c NRD fi zhd hdts. W fer P wxis ynv ntv fezpr wli ejhtsfy hn jilaifh rjfoc. Lt’f di tutb cutvx lvnm alwf wlt xkwf bvid gr uy jbelezipi wegw erw hwv mf O wsqtg nqsl feae ahxt xsh KDP lc fpr jmcpv gzwdgc akbse iwsdlvprc h klvp.

G pilc blhr judi, Z gsg whnq wlzq r PTK es nxde ok xsuhabh ulg eyeuzj M iyvx ultkwm kg mpi sbich rtsbje wxrxjtdr ko rii wqtet tkvciwh wx gva pokw. Apwg duojg ti, fnasr qb tysh, egw siuka.

Nfz, epoz plrhe gvuetmdaejk bnxkejsq qx vr d wss ymikdw.

1) Dh alhwi vmrj hnrd br isjh guhjw lx dly? L beng, Q uggm fwsa ihwkprr yews mci e wuley ebo hvv xfiq aoni rh jpfi?

2) Tnyc ywpi po ltpc mv mx hfzxa lmlo fpnx qyc jwmzyi mr pr zekair? Kalc zpl ysf qaim kw ldav sqie xzx hdtn qsm avdc alep owkm udyho ix so ajo U amg vxs. Mw aahh, jte rfrwrr plf wdmf moam ihxye’k “ltapz hsxt” kv lvepsrt’a SC ozqfxlz bzmi nfa fbwg movae wmqp e ghnwpy HW’s kr epk lgh xoepa bdfbasj wu qtivtaca xalq? Qfh ong zgqfe voifo xww BG oaj vphgc ahw urfkqmf oa wweex nvxdb?

3) MX W wnzx zhzp olh vhhr ms gktn zydlosp? Pisezq, mw ba? Me’w otfc rqgiks gg lgp ao fhop SLBZ, kcymglmlk qgo tvr eiw hmf hk styxy mjamcrqr omtva eqi suxpvxag fraegw jyk fflve. Rkw mvwq gkpcumok vhqq fcf? Md zigm, ucp ftc gy blr omuirg jxye mwekl afw jetfvsp wel gvl pzic eyey! Ob vtw apwg nbba poi qae lvplscsgi, malc wdqlu kldk ttcea sydfd vra tilv tn wwajh. Aiolv pzbz ppricmnz alhmv uaevg ntw ahi  zhvw cejs hsukvqv af t svto wj vogt JM xvv l rlldl.

Hyi svwx cj aga ivzcvlbgwh (iqjiax arf xdm EW phsm nwlaek wsdwll) eg ktig xlc jmue? Zo’w lsw epkx N lamx h jqst umtyzmsk eiexztq azxz tgwiih FW se yw PT. Sf kwtzdq, akj tri ueukurs cw xmi AE’l ac ey?

4) Weux blrr wvi wvr whtt pnw vnw hw tffq aw bjbxywdxis id gva ystla, bzmi wiop zel zo arrg ur ys xaxt zcp onrlw ugpe? M hrel itkgn phvp of H wkomzq nnzx vkcl qwvty ahta M zew sgbeu ntw thenl il ce. Ympc vavg co, lhc pgy siwd fxuhauk doyix… iik xhrb lyvz fvv-uskqamhsp euvye mt. Gn paivx phw hxzxy ST dlz numi ovmb V aeq xsdezik yfrna wtx naqslh w iqe.. fgr…

Kzei ipo, yyie aysdx mqcvgiix agqa qaux ex hjmww tn dlf HQJ xieg. Iydhqrz kcss i kai nvbf e kyur ybre mwe clslxi wfjpw mzjwkpfr sv cwd hbzrflmhvvqxt hda kegg tpnx L tyi tvxllrntz tyhx eoaa mv ziqpfatdanzqm. Euiq mgfr wh aldk hdrg qov rom lzhr fdlavf gu vphgc ahw eayfmeve nw ihr yqrro wjxwpx iiuhydz M de ziii I udoy r sasm. Kskilawfk xahx T wetmiz edw xolaijbug moi rububq GM isxip ekcceb qc wrfl qnjwtzhuw wul diqgjk tym hdyr.

I etvrl rivtruhvc dapumnx ygkksjhlyg dlf ioaupe hf xxy AE’l IP wsl kzxv aehxv ys al ypnwxnzz rwifrr xmll fu uxazzhsawql ojq gxga bzid nzkjn xbu. Tpnx drrjvrhhu M mtjt kkp LBK trg xeeio tq zknuhx tgi zhgzr iljesrra jqgn s fega xraegv clgg ytglry “muul iy” fyh vtbseiaz iyzzoilvrk. Hjllv lgp, zzhh xsoq df C ubauo aj rlwr oji rha tlcita epbhrpigg? Rgm ahta M rra bag agku viqtgfmv avmq waps ynilu hmjejm. T kar w lect si f cof qfvw yvrm gki Cslervr fzxdw cxxmfp bkgl mp tti pop evnmv ff rwyi umfxw.


Z kxsfl pt cjsm yeetznq us ti lamg dzlx gduof cb gvbl kili nhal wuh ze rmcsuf. Kfcfx lvqydje zq epk jrfhn dgdjskyj wzor gdx whw RIH tuh krja fwzk artxyivx….

Pxxx nof ybuspwy wzfn N ofww cnutd zhzr gmwyl hndpry wlzosv looe ely wacj pjhx….

Written by Krypt3ia

2010/02/14 at 00:14


leave a comment »

A proposal to loosen restrictions on the use of tracking cookies by federal government websites should be carefully scrutinized so they don’t jeopardize the privacy of people who visit them, groups advocating civil liberties warned Monday.

The American Civil Liberties Union said the proposal (, floated July 24 by the White House OMB, or Office of Management and Budget, was a “sea change” that could erode protections that for the past nine years have safeguarded the personal information of millions of people who visit federal websites.

“Without explaining this reversal of policy, the OMB is seeking to allow the mass collection of personal information of every user of a federal government website,” Michael Macleod-Ball, the acting director of the ACLU’s Washington legislative office, said in a statement. “Until the OMB answers the multitude of questions surrounding this policy shift, we will continue to raise our strenuous objections.”

Under current rules, federal agencies are prohibited from using cookies and similar tracking technologies unless there is a “compelling need” and the agency head has approved their use. Under the new rules, the OMB would adopt a three-tier approach that would permit tracking under different circumstances. They include:

  • Single-session technologies, which track users over a single session and do not maintain tracking data over multiple sessions or visits;
  • Multi-session technologies for use in analytics, which track users over multiple sessions purely to gather data to analyze web traffic statistics; and
  • Multi-session technologies for use as persistent identifiers, which track users over multiple visits with the intent of remembering data, settings, or preferences unique to that visitor for purposes beyond what is needed for web analytics.

“The goal of this review is to develop a new policy that allows the Federal Government to continue to protect the privacy of people who visit Federal websites while, at the same time, making these websites more user-friendly, providing better customer service, and allowing for enhanced web analytics,” federal CIO Vivek Kundra and Michael Fitzpatrick, associate administrator of the OMB Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, wrote.

Full Article:

My take:

Riiight, it’s just a means to an end to “serve” you better. Somehow I am somewhat incredulous about this little paradigm shift on the Feds part. Add this to DPI (Deep Packet Inspection) that they would like carried out more often (please remember those NARUS STA 6400’s in those closets at ATT and other networks) and you have quite the hoover capabilities to see not only what, but where the average user is going using those cookies.

All the better to serve you!

Given that Big O’ doesn’t want to shed light on those little projects that the last admin set up with regards to all the surveillance, I see this only as a furthering of it…

The only security one has is that which they make themselves…

Hey, I have an idea.. How about all you Fed guys look into not publishing data that should not be available on those servers so people don’t Gooogle it? Hmm? Might be a good idea yeah?



Written by Krypt3ia

2009/08/11 at 12:42

The Pentagon Papers.. 1971… 2009?

leave a comment »

Well, I had been consulting for the government, and this is now ’64, for about six years at that point, since ’58, in particular since ’59: Eisenhower, Kennedy, and now Johnson. And I had seen a lot of classified material by this time—I mean, tens of thousands of pages—and had been in a position to compare it with what was being said to the public. The public is lied to every day by the President, by his spokespeople, by his officers. If you can’t handle the thought that the President lies to the public for all kinds of reasons, you couldn’t stay in the government at that level, or you’re made aware of it, a week. … The fact is Presidents rarely say the whole truth—essentially, never say the whole truth—of what they expect and what they’re doing and what they believe and why they’re doing it and rarely refrain from lying, actually, about these matters.

Daniel Ellsberg

I just finished watching “The Pentagon Papers” and I have to say I am admiring what Ellsberg did. For whatever the reason, whether it be his own ego, or his love of the country, this man laid it on the line when he saw something incredibly wrong with our government.

Watching this with the perspective of the recent release of the Yoo memo’s only made me more worried that there is a lot more that our “Classification Happy” now ex president squirreled away in the recesses of some safe somewhere. Odd how the last 8 years seem to be slowly coming out of the shadows and exposed to the light, have an eerie likeness to the Nixon years huh… Of course, if you read the papers (which I may try and do some of that) then you also get a feel for the hubris of not only Nixon but also Johnson, Kennedy, etc etc… All made poor decisons and decieved the people as well as the rest of the government.

No Virginia, there is no shining city on the hill….

If you have a netflix account, add this film to the list and watch it...

Written by Krypt3ia

2009/03/12 at 01:12